The age I am trying to attract for my audience is people 18-24 years old and college athlete alumni, gender both male and female, economic status of any kind that relate or are into the issue.

I have to use what and how they get paid, why they should not in the first place, and why they are blessed enough to play the sport in college.

Bring self interest, both sides of beliefs towards my conflict, and a open mind to the issue.

• The evidence will require facts and data on revenue and profit the NCAA makes and what they do with all the extra money they have since they are a non profit organization. I also should point out what people pf the high office say and what former players have stated on this situation.
• I need enough evidence to get my argument across to where people will be moving to my side of my claim. If I can put into my peers eyes that money does not have to be the paper itself and put into something important like free education they should be satisfied.
• I have mixed evidence when I can because I have athletes perspective on it because they went through school not getting paid. Also I have a coaches view on it.
• I have selected the best pieces possible to help my claim and I can easily develop more than 3 reasons in my piece.

Thesis: If schools are saying its student first then athlete why are we now giving them money as a sport, like it is a job to them rather than the opportunity to play the sport longer than most even do. The NCAA needs to take a stand and file an appeal.

Evidence: My sources.

The age I am trying to attract for my audience is people 18-24 years old and college athlete alumni, gender both male and female, economic status of any kind that relate or are into the issue.

I must argue why students should not get paid compare these athletes to regular students and how they work full time just as these athletes do, but something they enjoy.

Free education, housing, food, tutoring, clothes, play the sport you love, books, etc.